Justin Trudeau and the firearms registry

10 December 2012 · 5 Comments   

In the speech he gave when he launched his campaign for the leadership of the Liberal Party, Justin Trudeau declared that “the only ideology that must guide us is evidence. Hard, scientific facts and data. … instead of inventing the facts to justify the policies, we will create policy based on facts.”

Mr. Trudeau did not wait very long before he contradicted himself. Last week, he declared that the registry for long guns was a failure, and this after voting several times against our government’s decision to abolish it. Why was it a failure? Because it was “deeply divisive” for Canadians. For him, the fact that registry is gone is the proof of its failure. What a completely incoherent argument this is!

Moreover, he said that he would again vote to keep the registry and he supports the Quebec government’s decision to set up its own registry. Does anyone have a clue where he stands?

Some weeks ago, I noted how Mr. Trudeau had reversed the cause and the effect in his explanation of economic growth. This time, he once again confuses the cause and the effect when he talks about the firearms registry. It’s not because it is gone that the registry was a failed policy; it is because it was a failed policy that our government abolished it!

As I wrote on this blog three years ago already, this registry has been an administrative and financial disaster since the start. According to government estimates at the time, it was supposed to cost 2 million dollars; instead, it cost 2 billion dollars, a thousand times more! Imagine what could have been done with all this money.

The auditor general had stated in one of her reports that there was no evidence that the registry had helped reduce crime. Very few crimes are committed with hunting rifles. The police can already find out who possesses a firearm by consulting the list for firearms possession and acquisition licenses.

A government policy should not be judged on its intentions but rather on its observable consequences. The intentions that led to the creation of the registry, saving lives and reducing criminality, were no doubt laudable. But it did not work. If Justin Trudeau wants to put forward positions based on hard facts, that’s the argument he should be using.

You can leave a response .

5 responses to “ Justin Trudeau and the firearms registry ”

  1. Twenty Fifteen says :

    Single issue voters concerned aboot personal liberty do not care about ANY other issue and will blindly vote for the youthful attractive Mr. Happy Pants turfing the Harperor from his throne.

  2. Relayer says :

    Mr. Bernier, I look forward to seeing you run for leader of the CPC when Mr. Harper steps down. We need a fiscally conservative libertarian, and I think you’d do well as PM.

  3. Don Morris says :

    I “second” what “relayer” said.

    Justin Trudeau might be the best leader of the LPC, for the Conservative Party. Unless I’m sadly mistaken, Canadians are too knowledgeable to vote for this inexperienced,unaccomplished,pretty face, over the sound management of Stephen Harper.

  4. Sean M says :

    Trudeau Jr. is full of you know what… coasting along on nothing more then his detestable name. “The LGR was a failure because it was divisive”… yeah, so is forced “bilingualism”. Does Trudeau Jr. understand how divisive and inherently racist forced “bilingualism is ? Of course he does, he said it himself when he went to New Brunswick a few years ago… will he now campaign to get rid of it ? Not bloody likely, considering he thinks it should be used to “conquer” Canada… full of you know what and a supremacist bigot, just like his old man.

  5. Bobjack says :

    Thank you Maxime Bernier,

    Firearm registry is just a scarescrow again conservative party, media bias in Quebec is just horrible.
    You are almost the only one polician I respect.

    Vive la Beauce.

Leave a reply